Jan 27th 2014

Why the United States is Not Greece or Italy – And Shouldn’t Act like It

by Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.
In the run-up to the Super Committee deadline, the news is filled with headlines about the potential default of Greece and Italy on their government debts. 
 
Some might think that these developments highlight the need for draconian austerity measures in the U.S. to prevent us from suffering a similar fate. The Republican Party claims that “our debt has put us on the same path as Greece.”  They would be wrong.
 
To see just how wrong, all you need do is look at the difference in what the U.S. Government is paying to borrow money today – and the rates being charged to Greece and Italy.  Last week the financial markets demanded 7% interest rates on 10-year Italian bonds. That ultimately forced the passage of unpopular austerity measures, and the resignation of Prime Minister Berlusconi.  Similarly onerous interest rates forced out Greek Prime Minister Papandreou several weeks ago.
 
Meanwhile, the yield on 10-year bonds has been at near-record lows – around 2% throughout the summer.  And 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds yields have hovered around 3%.
 
What explains the difference?
 
Is it the “excessive” social benefits offered by Greece and Italy? 
 
As economist Paul Krugman points out, there is no relation whatsoever between the level of social benefits and the interest rates demanded by financial markets. 
 
Of course all European countries offer substantially more generous social benefits to their citizens than does the United States – including universal health care.  But Italy and Greece do not have bigger welfare states than other countries that are doing quite well financially.  Before the crisis, social expenditure spending was lower in Greece and Italy than it was in Germany – and a good deal lower than in Sweden where GDP has been growing throughout the crisis.
 
Meanwhile, Canada, which has universal health care and much more robust social safety net programs than the United States, did a much better job weathering the financial crisis of 2008 and the years since than did the United States.
 
No, other factors are at work here.
 
Fundamentally --no matter what Standard and Poor’s says about the unreliability of the Federal Government’s financial decision-making --world financial markets still consider U.S. Treasury Notes the safest investment in the world.  In fact, in a perverse sense, troubles elsewhere make U.S. Treasuries more attractive. 
 
Whatever you think about the issues underlying the European financial market crisis, its facts simply cannot be denied.  The numbers are there for everyone to see.
 
There are a number of key factors that contribute to the relative security of U.S. Treasuries– and they are likely to make it so well into the future.
 
The critical difference between the financial structure of the United States and Europe is that we have our own national currency, and the countries of the Eurozone do not.
 
In the United States, Congress, as dysfunctional as it sometimes is, provides a mechanism to forge a nationwide fiscal policy.  Europe, where most fiscal decisions are made at the national levels, has no comparable mechanism. What you get instead is a hodge-podge of policies – what you’d have gotten in the U.S. if we had kept the Articles of Confederation rather than the U.S. Constitution.
 
The U.S. Constitution not only gives the United States the ability to decide – country-wide – how much the largest player in the Government bond market will borrow.  It also gives us the ability to handle differences in the economic circumstances of our states without threatening the collapse of the entire national economy – or the financial system --and to prevent the internal political problems that result.
 
Economic problems in Mississippi do not require, for instance, that the government of New York vote to “bail out” Mississippi.  In Europe, the other governments of the Eurozone – especially Germany and France – had to make that very unpopular political decision.
 
While the common European currency worked fine so long as the zone – and the world – experienced sustained growth, the lack of common fiscal policy makes it particularly vulnerable in periods of economic stagnation or recession.  And it deprives the Eurozone of the fiscal and monetary tools to dampen the effects of recessionary economic forces.
 
In a period of recession or economic stagnation there is a natural and desirable increase in government debt as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), since there are more demands on governmental social safety net programs – and less tax revenue.
 
That increase in government deficit spending offsets the decreased private economic demand that is the root cause of recessions.   It provides an important means of ending the downward recessionary spiral – preventing depression – and restoring an economy to long-term economic growth.
 
In the United States, as deficits increase during a recession, the Federal Reserve has the ability to increase the money supply and keep interests rates low – in both the markets for private and for government debt.
 
Because the U.S. has its own currency – and because much of the world’s transactions are denominated in dollars – our government can borrow money denominated in our own currency and control overall interest rates in our economy.
 
In the United States, the Federal Reserve has the ability to “monetize” the federal debt.  It can directly purchase government bonds without having to borrow the money to pay for them. That helps drive down interest rates on government or private debt by expanding the money supply – by “printing money.”
 
The power – and willingness – of the Federal Reserve to control interest rates and the money supply – is a critical factor that helps make U.S. Government debt such a safe bet to private investors.  Investors who buy U.S. Government bonds are much less prone to panic if they know that the Fed can step in to provide a market for U.S. government debt.
 
The system has some of the same effect on financial markets as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation does on bank depositors. There are less likely to be run on a bank that causes it to go out of business, if you know that the FDIC will cover your losses if there ever is a bank collapse.  That in turn becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy – fewer banks collapse because there are fewer bank panics, or runs on the bank.
 
In the case of the Fed’s ability to buy government bonds, a run on U.S. Treasury bonds is less likely because the Fed can – and will – step in to stabilize the government bond market.
 
Not so in Europe.
 
The European Central Bank (ECB) is forbidden by its charter from buying  government bonds directly from participating countries.  And it has been unwilling to take the intermediary step of buying large numbers of government bonds on the private market. 
 
To make matters worse, none of the participating countries has any direct control over the value of its own currency whatsoever. 
 
In a recession, when the percentage of Government debt to GDP goes up automatically, that makes it impossible for any individual government – like Greece or Italy – to “monetize” its government debt.  They have given up the power to do so to the European Central Bank that is controlled by all of Europe, and as a practical matter, by the biggest players and particularly Germany.    Each individual country has zero ability to independently control interest rates in its own economy.
 
There have been growing calls in Europe to change the ECB charter – or at the least for the ECB to intervene forcefully in the private market for government bonds and hence “monetize” the debts of member countries by increasing the overall money supply in Europe.    Without this kind of backing Eurozone member country debt is ripe for speculative panic and attack.   If the ECB took this kind of action, the European “financial crisis” would likely end. 
 
Or as the New York Times analyst Jack Ewing wrote this morning, “What markets want to hear, though, is not only prescriptions for long–term overhauls but also assurances that the central bank will do whatever it takes to prevent near-term panic.”
 
In fact, you could argue that much of this “crisis” has in fact been manufactured by “austerity hawks” in Europe who want to use market pressure to force austerity measures on member governments.  In fact, last week the ECB actually cut its overall purchases of government bonds on the private market at precisely the time that Italy’s bonds were spiking to 7%.  Jens Weidmann, head of the German Bundesbank and German representative to the ECB governing board is quoted in Tuesday’s Washington Post arguing that the ECB “cannot and should not solve the financial problems of states.”
 
Europe faces another problem we don’t have in the United States. If countries that control their own fiscal and monetary policy have their own currencies, then economic imbalances between them often appear in changes in the values of those currencies relative to each other.  That’s true at least if they are allowed to float on world currency markets.  Note that one of the big disputes between the U.S. and China today is that the Chinese don’t allow their own currency to float relative to the dollar, resulting in relatively lower prices for Chinese goods in the U.S. and higher prices for U.S. goods in China.
 
But when different countries without common fiscal or monetary policies have a common currency, those economic imbalances aren’t reflected in the value of discreet currencies – since all of those countries have the same currency with one value against all others.  The result is that these imbalances come out in other ways. We’re seeing one of those in the default crisis in the Eurozone.
 
In addition, the European banking system is more fragile and vulnerable to market fluctuations because bank regulators in Europe have been less prone to demand higher capital requirements for European banks than regulators in the U.S. – despite heavy lobbying aimed at their European counterparts by the Obama Administration. That creates yet another factor enhancing the instability of Eurozone finances.
 
Finally, the Congressional Budget Office’s baseline estimate is that public debt in the United States will rise to and level off at no more than 74% of GDP.  The CIA world fact book estimates that last year public debt hit 142% of GDP in Greece and 119 % of GDP in Italy.
 
The level of public debt in the United States is qualitatively lower than it is in Greece and Italy.
 
As a result of all of these factors, the United States is not facing imminent default or exploding interest rates on government debt.  But the European crisis – and the potential reaction of the media, the Super Committee and other elites in the United States – could endanger us greatly. 
 
Of course a full out meltdown of the European financial system would send shock waves throughout the world economy.  That could be the result of the brinksmanship being played by Europe’s “austerity hawks.”
 
But if the “austerity hawks” are successful at forcing more draconian cutbacks, that will have bad consequences as well.
 
For decades, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has preached the need for fiscal constraint and austerity. According to the Washington Post, now even the IMF is warning that, “austerity may trigger a new recession,” and is urging countries to look for ways to boost growth.
 
Because they have no Eurozone-wide fiscal policy, countries in Europe like Greece and Italy are forced into “austerity” policies by the financial sector to avoid default.  That will simply make matters worse in the near term, and certainly over the long run.
 
Not one of the European countries that has tried to cut its way out of recession has been successful.  In Ireland, where government spending was slashed to appease financial markets, unemployment is now 14% and interest rates on Irish bonds are higher than Italy’s – about 8%.
 
If you want to lay a foundation for long-term economic growth in Europe or America, the last thing you would do is reduce the income going to ordinary citizens – even over the long run.  That’s not the problem – just the opposite.  The concentration of economic wealth in the top 1% prevents everyday consumers from having the money to buy the goods and services that an increasingly productive economy produce. We do not need ordinary people to “share in the sacrifice.”  We need policies that will increase the share of income going to ordinary people to reduce the exploding inequality between the 99% and the 1%.  
 
And it is critical to remember that in the end, economics is not about interest rates, or even prices or trade flows. These are just means to an end. 
 
Economics is ultimately about two things:
 
·      The production of goods and services by living, breathing human beings.
·      The distribution of those goods and services among the population.
 
The United States has a talented, willing workforce with abundant natural resources.  Our problem is not our inability to produce a bigger economic pie.  It is that the system that organizes the workforce – and deploys those resources -- has broken down.  As a result, one out of ten Americans who wants to work can’t find an organization that will deploy their talent and time to produce goods and services.
 
That system has not broken down because we spend too much on government.  It has broken down because there is not enough economic demand to incentivize private employers to hire workers.  Business doesn’t need more “confidence,” it needs more customers.
 
To get the economies of the U.S. and Europe moving again, government needs to step in to provide that demand – to jumpstart economic activity.  We do not need an “austerity proposal” from the Super Committee.  We do need to pass the American Jobs Act.
 
We know this is true from everything in economic history.  And we can’t afford to be confused by ideologues from the right who demand that we “cut government spending” so we won’t be “like” Greece or Italy.
 

Browse articles by author

More Current Affairs

Mar 18th 2024
EXTRACT: "....the UK’s current economic woes – falling exports, slowing growth, low productivity, high taxes, and strained public finances – underscore the urgency of confronting Brexit’s catastrophic consequences."
Mar 18th 2024
EXTRACTS: Most significant of all, Russia’s Black Sea fleet has suffered significant losses over the past two years. As a result of these Ukrainian successes, the Kremlin decided to relocate the Black Sea fleet from Sevastopol to Novorossiysk on the Russian mainland. Compare that with the situation prior to the annexation of Crimea in 2014 when Russia had a secure lease on the naval base of Sevastopol until 2042." --- "Ukrainian efforts have clearly demonstrated, however, that the Kremlin’s, and Putin’s personal, commitment may not be enough to secure Russia’s hold forever. Kyiv’s western partners would do well to remember that among the spreading gloom over the trajectory of the war."
Mar 8th 2024
EXTRACT: "As the saying goes, 'It’s the economy, stupid.' Trump’s proposed economic-policy agenda is now the greatest threat to economies and markets around the world."
Mar 8th 2024
EXTRACT: "Russia, of course, brought all these problems on itself. It most certainly is not winning the war, either militarily or on the economic front. Ukraine is recovering from the initial shock, and if robust foreign assistance continues, it will have an upper hand in the war of attrition."
Mar 8th 2024
EXTRACT: "...... with good timing and good luck, enabled Trump to defeat [in 2016] political icon Hillary Clinton in a race that appeared tailor-made for her. But contrary to what Trump might claim, his victory was extremely narrow. In fact, he lost the popular vote by 2.8 million votes – a larger margin than any other US president in history. Since then, Trump has proved toxic at the ballot box. " -----"The old wisdom that 'demographics is destiny' – coined by the French philosopher Auguste Comte – may well be more relevant to the outcome than it has been to any previous presidential election. "----- "Between the 2016 and 2024 elections, some 20 million older voters will have died, and about 32 million younger Americans will have reached voting age. Many young voters disdain both parties, and Republicans are actively recruiting (mostly white men) on college campuses. But the issues that are dearest to Gen Z’s heart – such as reproductive rights, democracy, and the environment – will keep most of them voting Democratic."
Mar 8th 2024
EXTRACTS: "How can America’s fundamentalist Christians be so enthusiastic about so thoroughly un-Christian a politician?" ---- "If you see and think outside the hermeneutic code of Christian fundamentalism, you might be forgiven for viewing Trump as a ruthless, wholly self-interested man intent on maximizing power, wealth, and carnal pleasure. What your spiritual blindness prevents you from seeing is how the Holy Spirit uses him – channeling the 'secret power of lawlessness,' as the Book of 2 Thessalonians describes it – to restrain the advent of ultimate evil, or to produce something immeasurably greater: the eschaton (end of history), when the messiah comes again."
Mar 1st 2024
EXTRACT: "The lesson is that laws and regulatory structures are critical to state activities that produce local-level benefits. If citizens are to push for reforms and interventions that increase efficiency, promote inclusion, and enable entrepreneurship, innovation, and long-term growth, they need to recognize this. The kind of effective civil society Nilekani envisions thus requires civic engagement, empowerment, and education, including an understanding of the rights and responsibilities implied by citizenship."
Feb 9th 2024
EXTRACT: "Despite the widespread belief that the global economy is headed for a soft landing, recent trends offer little cause for optimism."
Feb 9th 2024
EXTRACT: " Consider, for example, the ongoing revolution in robotics and automation, which will soon lead to the development of robots with human-like features that can learn and multitask the way we do. Or consider what AI will do for biotech, medicine, and ultimately human health and lifespans. No less intriguing are the developments in quantum computing, which will eventually merge with AI to produce advanced cryptography and cybersecurity applications."
Feb 9th 2024
EXTRACTS: "The implication is clear. If Hamas is toppled, and there is no legitimate Palestinian political authority capable of filling the vacuum it leaves behind, Israel will probably find itself in a new kind of hell." ----- "As long as the PLO fails to co-opt Hamas into the political process, it will be impossible to establish a legitimate Palestinian government in post-conflict Gaza, let alone achieve the dream of Palestinian statehood. This is bad news for both Israelis and Palestinians. But it serves Netanyahu and his coalition of extremists just fine."
Jan 28th 2024
EXTRACTS: "According to estimates by the United Nations, China’s working-age population peaked in 2015 and will decline by nearly 220 million by 2049. Basic economics tells us that maintaining steady GDP growth with fewer workers requires extracting more value-added from each one, meaning that productivity growth is vital. But with China now drawing more support from low-productivity state-owned enterprises, and with the higher-productivity private sector remaining under intense regulatory pressure, the prospects for an acceleration of productivity growth appear dim."
Jan 28th 2024
EXTRACT: "When Chamberlain negotiated the notorious Munich agreement with Hitler in September 1938, The Times did not oppose the transfer of the Sudetenland to Germany without Czech consent. Instead, Britain’s most prestigious establishment broadsheet declared that: “The volume of applause for Mr Chamberlain, which continues to grow throughout the globe, registers a popular judgement that neither politicians nor historians are likely to reverse.” "
Jan 4th 2024
EXTRACTS: "Another Trump presidency, however, represents the greatest threat to global stability, because the fate of liberal democracy would be entrusted to a leader who attacks its fundamental principles." ------"While European countries have relied too heavily on US security guarantees, America has been the greatest beneficiary of the post-war political and economic order. By persuading much of the world to embrace the principles of liberal democracy (at least rhetorically), the US expanded its global influence and established itself as the world’s “shining city on a hill.” Given China and Russia’s growing assertiveness, it is not an exaggeration to say that the rules-based international order might not survive a second Trump term."
Dec 28th 2023
EXTRACT: "For the most vulnerable countries, we must create conditions that enable them to finance their climate-change mitigation" ........ "The results are already there: in two years, following the initiative we took in Paris in the spring of 2021, we have released over $100 billion in special drawing rights (SDRs, the International Monetary Fund’s reserve asset) for vulnerable countries.By activating this “dormant asset,” we are extending 20-year loans at near-zero interest rates to finance climate action and pandemic preparedness in the poorest countries. We have begun to change debt rules to suspend payments for such countries, should a climate shock occur. And we have changed the mandate of multilateral development banks, such as the World Bank, so that they take more risks and mobilize more private money."
Dec 27th 2023
EXTRACT: "....if AI causes truly catastrophic increases in inequality – say, if the top 1% were to receive all pretax income – there might be limits to what tax reforms could accomplish. Consider a country where the top 1% earns 20% of pretax income – roughly the current world average. If, owing to AI, this group eventually received all pretax income, it would need to be taxed at a rate of 80%, with the revenue redistributed as tax credits to the 99%, just to achieve today’s pretax income distribution; funding the government and achieving today’s post-tax income distribution would require an even higher rate. Given that such high rates could discourage work, we would likely have to settle for partial inequality insurance, analogous to having a deductible on a conventional insurance policy to reduce moral hazard."
Dec 21st 2023
EXTRACT: "Shocks are here to stay, and our task is not to predict the next one – although someone always does – but to sharpen our focus on resilience. Staying the course of politically mandated policies while minimizing the inevitable dislocations is easier said than done. But that is no excuse to fall for the myth of being victimized by the unprecedented."
Dec 21st 2023
EXTRACTS: "A new world is indeed emerging. It will be characterized not only by more interdependencies, but also by more insecurity, danger, and war. Stability in international relations will become a foreign concept from a bygone age – one that we did not fully appreciate until it was gone."
Dec 14th 2023
EXTRACT: "Yet one must never forget that Putin is first and foremost an intelligence officer whose dominant trait is suspicion."
Dec 2nd 2023
EXTRACTS: "In a recent commentary for the Financial Times, Martin Wolf trots out the specter of a 'public-debt disaster,' that recurrent staple of bond-market chatter. The essence of his argument is that since debt-to-GDP ratios are high, and eminent authorities are alarmed, 'fiscal crises' in the form of debt defaults or inflation “loom. And that means something must be done.' ----- "If, as Wolf fears, 'real interest rates might be permanently higher than they used to be,' the culprit is monetary policy, and the real risk is not rich-country public-debt defaults or inflation. It is recession, bankruptcies, and unemployment, along with inflation." ---- "Wolf surely knows that the proper remedy is for rich-country central banks to bring interest rates back down. Yet he doesn’t want to say it. He seems to be caught up, possibly against his better judgment, in bond vigilantes’ evergreen campaign against the remnants of the welfare state."
Nov 27th 2023
EXTRACT: "The first Russia, comprising those living in Russia’s two biggest cities, Moscow and Saint Petersburg, can pretend there is no war at all." ---- "Then there is the other Russia, the one you find in small towns and villages scattered across the country’s massive territory. Here, the Ukraine war is a source of patriotic pride,"